Reviewer Policies
- Conflict of Interest and Financial Disclosures (specific to reviewers)
The International Journal of Advanced Research and Review (IJARR) is committed to upholding the highest standards of integrity, transparency, and fairness in the peer review process. A core component of this commitment is ensuring that conflicts of interest (COI) are disclosed and appropriately managed. This policy applies specifically to reviewers, who play a crucial role in evaluating the quality and rigor of manuscripts submitted for publication.
Reviewers must disclose any potential conflicts of interest that could influence their impartiality in reviewing a manuscript. A conflict of interest may arise if a reviewer has a personal, professional, or financial relationship with the authors of the manuscript or with the subject matter being evaluated. This includes, but is not limited to, situations where the reviewer is a collaborator, competitor, or has any financial interest in the research being reviewed. In addition, any relationships with funding agencies, institutions, or organizations that could be perceived as a conflict must be disclosed.
To maintain the integrity of the review process, if a reviewer identifies a conflict of interest, they are required to recuse themselves from the review of that particular manuscript. If an appropriate replacement reviewer is needed, the editorial team will assign another qualified individual who does not have a conflict. This ensures that manuscripts are evaluated solely on their scientific merit, methodology, and contribution to the field.
Reviewers are also encouraged to disclose any financial interests related to the research, such as consultancy fees, funding, or stock ownership that may present a potential bias. Full disclosure of these financial relationships helps the editorial board make informed decisions regarding potential conflicts.
The goal of this policy is to protect the credibility and objectivity of the peer-review process, ensuring that all published research in IJARR is subjected to unbiased, rigorous evaluation.
2. Reviewers Guidelines
The International Journal of Advanced Research and Review (IJARR) relies on the expertise of reviewers to evaluate the scientific quality and relevance of submitted manuscripts. The reviewer’s role is critical to maintaining the integrity and credibility of the journal, and the guidelines provided ensure that the review process is fair, thorough, and transparent.
Reviewers are expected to assess manuscripts based on several key criteria, including the originality of the research, the robustness of the methodology, the clarity of the writing, and the significance of the findings within the context of existing literature. Reviewers should evaluate whether the research is scientifically sound, whether the conclusions are supported by the data, and whether the manuscript contributes meaningfully to the academic field. They are encouraged to provide constructive and detailed feedback that will help authors improve their work. Feedback should be specific, objective, and focused on the manuscript’s content rather than the author’s identity.
In addition to the scientific content, reviewers must also assess whether the manuscript complies with ethical guidelines, including the appropriate handling of human and animal subjects, conflicts of interest, and proper citation practices. Reviewers are expected to check for plagiarism and ensure that proper attribution is given to prior research. If any ethical violations are identified, reviewers should alert the editorial team immediately, and the matter will be addressed according to the journal’s ethics policies.
The review process at IJARR is double-blind, meaning that both the authors and reviewers are anonymized. Reviewers should refrain from sharing the manuscript with others or using the ideas or data presented in the manuscript for their own research prior to publication, as this would violate ethical guidelines regarding confidentiality.
Reviewers are also expected to complete their reviews within the time frame assigned by the editorial team. If a reviewer is unable to complete a review on time due to any conflict, lack of expertise, or other reasons, they should notify the editorial team as soon as possible so that an alternative reviewer can be found.
Finally, reviewers should maintain professionalism in their evaluations and avoid any personal bias. Constructive feedback should be aimed at improving the manuscript, not disparaging the author or their work. The IJARR editorial team values reviewers who provide insightful, respectful, and thorough critiques that contribute to the high standards of the journal.
These guidelines are designed to ensure that all reviews are conducted ethically, thoroughly, and transparently, reinforcing the quality and credibility of the publication process in IJARR.
